I don’t want to go into this further, since this shouldn’t be a topic. Therefore, Microsoft partly had to take paths that more or less make life difficult for the honest user.
Now, you can think what you want about Microsoft, but so far they are still the unchallenged leader of installed desktop operating systems. But this is of course not a guarantee that nothing will ever happen here. And the more resources are used for this, the more gaps are found.Īn operating system with a low distribution is therefore not secure, but only uninteresting for “hackers” because the effort to find the gaps is not in any relation to the “yield”. The more widespread it is, the more people have an interest in “cracking” other computers. Security is inversely proportional to the distribution of an operating system. No matter from which manufacturer or which type. The truth is that every operating system has gaps, and plenty of them. And that other operating systems are much more secure. Surely everyone knows the reports about Windows and its security.
Something like a secure operating system does not actually exist, and with increasing complexity will probably never exist. Even though many may now cry out and consider their favorite operating system to be secure per se, this is merely a fallacy. However, the term “more secure” is actually wrong here. Since Windows 7, Microsoft has tried to make their operating system more secure.
0 kommentar(er)
